Gardashicage Richardson has signed several unfair labor practice charges filed by the Union. In preparing to rate Richardson for the period, Fallaw sought the input of the working-level supervisors who had observed Richardson ag closely. Fallaw answered that it did not. In her appraisal for the April March period, Fallaw gave Richardson exactly the same ratings as in the previous wf with respect to each of the critical and noncritical performance elements. In that z Letterkenny case, the Administrative Law Judge had recommended dismissing the complaint on the basis that, assuming that the General Counsel had established a prima facie case, the forrm had established what would now be considered a Letterkenny affirmative defense. If the scores were colored by any bias, it appears to me at least as likely that such bias arose from personal considerations as that it arose from antiunion motivation.
|Published (Last):||22 February 2007|
|PDF File Size:||18.88 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Zuzuru Fallaw sought more specific information from both Longman and Childers regarding their recommended appraisals, but received none. Motivation here is an ultimate fact that will be analyzed later in this decision. On March 27,Msgt.
There were no material conflicts in testimony. This was the appraisal immediately preceding the one at issue here. However, if this is an inconsistency it is not one that suggests an improper motive. Although the probability that these filings were other than protected activity seems remote, the General Counsel has not urged any reliance on this activity and the record provides insufficient basis to find that this actually was protected activity.
You are here Home U. Between October and November 19, the date of the hearing in this case Fallaw was mentioned in several grievances filed by Richardson and in several unfair labor practice charges filed by the Union. In preparing to rate Richardson for the period, Fallaw sought the input of the working-level supervisors who had observed Richardson most closely.
She advises the supervisor what she needs the time for and for how long, and completes the standard official time form to account for the time. In upholding the Wright Line test, the Supreme Court stated: Fallaw had written the following as part of her comment in the space provided for substantiation of the rating:.
In the instant case, there is no direct evidence of antiunion animus on the part of the appraising supervisor. Richardson then asked her what the comment referred to. Smith has developed a streamlined process for completing shift turn over within his shop -He created several post deployment financial reimbursements worksheets -Nuclear certified equipment monitor guaranteed Zero Defects in wing weapons safety inspection -He always ready to step up and help other shops get the job done -Constantly a go to technician for hydraulic system information across the maintenance group -Mr.
Fallaw did not recall that such a conversation occurred Tr. The possibility of personal animosity or insecurity is suggested by: Nor does it pass on the fairness of the ratings. What I am saying is that any contributory bias might have included one, the other, both, or neither, and that the evidence that an antiunion-based bias played any role does not preponderate.
The General Counsel relies heavily but unpersuasively on the timing of the appraisal. It contains a set of ratings and comments by Msgt. Most Related.
AF Form 860A Example Bullets
Zuzuru Fallaw sought more specific information from both Longman and Childers regarding their recommended appraisals, but received none. Motivation here is an ultimate fact that will be analyzed later in this decision. On March 27,Msgt. There were no material conflicts in testimony.
AF FORM 860A PDF
Targ AF Form A Example Bullets Whatever the reason for these actions, the circumstances do not permit anything more aaf a suspicion that antiunion considerations were a contributing factor. The scores that dropped were:. Smith is highly involved proactive member of the units retirement program make certain every detail is covered -Mr. The report has a different format than the civilian side AF Form A. This was the appraisal immediately preceding the aaf at issue here. Such conduct, as alleged in the complaint, violated sections a 12 and 4 of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute the Statute. Fallaw responded that it did not.